Ethena Labs officially announced the withdrawal of its proposal to issue Hyperliquid’s USDH stablecoin. This decision followed intense governance debates within the Hyperliquid ecosystem, where validator votes increasingly favored Native Markets, another team competing to issue the same stablecoin.
It had initially submitted a proposal to issue USDH, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, on Hyperliquid. They planned to bring experience from building USDe and related products into Hyperliquid’s ecosystem. The proposal promised security, efficiency, and innovation.
However, the team faced resistance from parts of the community. Some validators questioned whether being an external team with other product lines was the right fit to manage Hyperliquid’s native stablecoin. Despite strong capabilities, these concerns grew louder as discussions unfolded.

Source: Official Ethena Labs X
As the governance process unfolded, validator support clearly shifted in favor of Native Markets. The company appreciated the result and reacted in a very classy manner by retracting its offer. In their official statement, the team congratulated Native Markets on gaining the trust of the community.
It emphasized that the decision-making process in HYPE is based on fairness and decentralization, such that reputation, size, or financial resources are irrelevant in comparison with the support of a community.
By withdrawing, the company allowed validators to consolidate their votes toward Native Markets without division. This respectful move also showed maturity, putting community consensus above competition. Although this withdrawal was a blow, it showed how flexible the company was and its vision of the long term.
The withdrawal was the result of legitimate complaints of the Hyperliquid population. First, Ethena Labs was not a Hyperliquid-native team, which limited its credibility in the eyes of many validators. Second, it manages multiple product lines beyond USDH, raising doubts about its focus.
Third, its broader ambitions—including partnerships with other exchanges—conflicted with the community’s desire for a fully dedicated stablecoin issuer. Ethena acknowledged these points in its official X post, admitting the pushback was reasonable. Instead of continuing a losing battle, the team stepped aside with respect, honoring Hyperliquid’s democratic governance process.
Even without USDH, it remains committed to HYPE. The team will now focus on launching innovative products such as hUSDe synthetic dollars, USDe-powered savings and spending cards, and hedging flows integrated into HYPE. Also excites the community about HIP-3 markets, enabling reward-bearing trading collateral, modular prime broking, and equity perpetual swaps.
These products, according to the team, align better with its long-term vision than simply managing a stablecoin. Ethena sees this as an opportunity to prove its strength through product innovation.
The withdrawal highlights its resilience, humility, and commitment to innovation. Instead of clinging to a lost proposal, it chooses to double down on creating meaningful DeFi products, showing its strength lies in long-term value creation over short-term wins.
The withdrawal reflects more than just a lost opportunity—it demonstrates the fairness of decentralized governance and Ethena’s determination to innovate. As HYPE grows, the company's future products could shape the ecosystem in even bigger ways than USDH ever could.
Sakshi Jain is a crypto journalist with over 3 years of experience in industry research, financial analysis, and content creation. She specializes in producing insightful blogs, in-depth news coverage, and SEO-optimized content. Passionate about bringing clarity and engagement to the fast-changing world of cryptocurrencies, Sakshi focuses on delivering accurate and timely insights. As a crypto journalist at Coin Gabbar, she researches and analyzes market trends, reports on the latest crypto developments and regulations, and crafts high-quality content on emerging blockchain technologies.