The debate over India Crypto regulation has reached a new turning point. A new government paper reveals deep concerns that giving digital assets official recognition could backfire.
Instead of solving risks, regulation might actually make them systemic—spreading threats from individual investors to the entire economy.

Source: Kashif Raza, Founder of Bitinning
At the same time, India crypto ban news is gaining traction, since peer-to-peer transfers and decentralised exchanges remain unstoppable. This double-edged situation has left the government facing one of its toughest financial dilemmas yet.
The official India crypto discussion paper outlines two key reasons behind hesitation on Indian crypto policy:
Stablecoins Could Harm UPI: Country’s fast digital payment backbone is a global success story. If pegged cryptocurrency becomes popular, it could weaken Unified Payments Interface by dividing payments between UPI and private tokens. In simple words, Stablecoins risks UPI payments.
Systemic Risk: Once regulation is introduced, banks, companies, and households may adopt it more widely. A market crash in such a scenario could hit not just traders but the entire financial system.
These 2 points show why the government thinks this act could give legitimacy, but also increase risks for the whole economy.
Latest news in cryptocurrency highlights one of the biggest alarms in the asset regulation: The risk of stablecoins fragmenting UPI.
The Unified Payments Interface powers trade, salaries, and everyday household transactions. If stablecoins dominate, people may bypass UPIs, leading to divided usage and loss of regulatory control.
This could weaken innovation, reduce trust, and even increase illegal activities like fraud or tax evasion. The report underlines this as a direct threat to our digital payments system.
In the India cryptocurrency ban discussion vs regulation, the government says it has two tough choices right now:
A ban may sound like an easy fix, but it cannot stop peer-to-peer trades or decentralised exchanges.
India crypto regulation would make assets look trusted . But this could push more people to use it, which may create bigger risks for the whole system.
This is why the country has so far avoided a final stance. In 2021, a draft bill to ban private cryptocurrencies was never passed into law.
Then, while serving in the G20 presidency in 2023, they were intent on gaining acceptance of a global framework, while delaying their own decision. Today, the country is still cautiously balancing between control and risk.
Even after high taxes and many warnings, Indians have already put about $4.5 billion into cryptocurrencies. This is not a big danger for the economy yet, but it clearly shows strong public interest in India crypto news today.
If the government tries banning digital assets, people may still trade them secretly, outside official control. For now, the latest India crypto regulation step has been to wait and watch until there is more global clarity.
But as more people start using digital assets, the risks will also grow. This raises an important question—is it already too late to stop this rising momentum?
Sara Sethiya is an experienced crypto journalist with five years of experience in blockchain research, price movements, and market analysis. With a background in mass communication and journalism, she specializes in data-driven news articles, in-depth market reports, and SEO-optimized content. As a team lead and content writer at CoinGabbar, she examines on-chain metrics, evaluates liquidity trends, and analyzes tokenomics to uncover market patterns. Her analytical approach helps traders and investors interpret market shifts, identify potential opportunities, and understand the broader impact of blockchain innovations on the financial ecosystem.