Pons Launchpad V1 vs V2: Complete Launch Model Comparison

Pons Launchpad V1 vs V2 comparison

Pons Launchpad V1 vs V2: Which Launch Model Is Better for Users?

Pons has run two very different pricing models for launching tokens on Robinhood Chain, and knowing which one you're looking at changes how you should read a launch's chart. This breaks down Pons Launchpad V1 vs V2 differences in simple terms, sourced directly from pons' own official documentation for both versions.

Key takeaways:

  • Version-1 launches go straight into a live trading pool from block one. Version-2 launches start on a bonding curve and only get a pool once that curve sells out.

  • Snipe protection works completely differently between the two wallet caps on Version 1, a decaying tax on Version 2.

  • Version-2 adds custom pairing assets beyond ETH and graduates into Uniswap version-4 instead of version-3.

What Is Pons Launchpad?

Pons Launchpad is a place to launch and trade tokens on Robinhood Chain. Anyone can browse launches, open a token to see its details, and trade straight from their own wallet.

It never takes custody of anyone's tokens or funds, on either version. Every action creating a launch, buying, selling, claiming fees is a transaction your wallet signs directly.

Pons Launchpad V1: How the Original Model Works

Pons V1 launches a token straight into a live trading pool, paired against WETH, from the very first block. There's no separate curve phase the pool exists as soon as the token is created, and trading opens immediately.

Because a launch is tradable that early, original model relies on wallet-based limits to blunt sniping in its opening moments. In the first two blocks after a launch goes live, only the creator can make the very first purchase, and buyers face wallet caps roughly 5% of supply in block one and 5.5% in block two before those restrictions lift.

Pons token launch on orginal model is a single-stage event: the token is priced by an open Uniswap pool from the start, and price discovery happens the normal way any Uniswap pair trades, just with those early wallet caps in place to slow down bot-driven buying.

Pons Launchpad V2: What Changed

Pons V2 replaces that instant-pool model with a bonding curve. A launch no longer starts life as a pool it starts on a curve holding the entire token supply, and the pool only gets created once that curve sells out, a step called graduation.

The Pons bonding curve works like a vending machine that always has stock: it holds the full supply from creation, and it will always buy and sell at a price calculated from how much supply has already been bought. More buying pushes price up, more selling pushes it down, and the starting price isn't zero.

Once the curve sells out, everything it collected plus tokens held back specifically for this purpose builds a Uniswap version-4 pool with liquidity locked permanently. Version-2 also lets a launch pair against tokens other than ETH, including tokenized stocks, which changes what currency the whole launch trades in. (Source: official V2 documentation) 

Head-to-Head: Pons V1 vs V2 Launchpad Comparison

Feature

Pons Launchpad V1

Pons Launchpad V2

Starting state

Live Uniswap pool from block one

Bonding curve holding full supply

Pairing asset

WETH only

ETH or any approved token, including tokenized stocks

Graduation step

None — pool exists immediately

Curve sells out, then pool is created

Destination pool

Uniswap v3

Uniswap v4

Snipe protection

Wallet caps in first two blocks (5% / 5.5%)

Decaying buy tax, 99% down to 0% over five seconds

Liquidity lock

Locked at pool creation

Locked permanently at graduation

Snipe Protection: Wallet Caps vs. a Decaying Tax

This is one of the clearest Pons Version 1 vs Version 2 token launch differences. Version-1 stops early snipers by physically capping how much of the supply any single wallet can buy in the first two blocks. It's a hard limit you simply can't buy more than your cap allows, no matter what you're willing to pay.

V2 takes a pricing-based approach instead. A buy tax starts at 99% the instant a launch goes live and decays to zero across five seconds, sitting near 25% at the one-second mark. Selling is never taxed by it, and whatever gets collected flows back into the launch's normal fee distribution rather than disappearing.

Neither approach is strictly better Version 1 wallet caps are simple and predictable, while version-2 decaying tax scales with actual bot behavior rather than applying a flat, fixed limit to every buyer regardless of size.

Which Version Should You Use?

For creators, original model offers a simpler, single-stage launch with fewer moving parts to explain to a community. Version 2 offers more controlled early price discovery through the curve, plus the flexibility of custom pairing assets, at the cost of an extra graduation step before a real Uniswap pool exists.

For traders, the practical difference shows up in what you're actually buying. On a original model launch, you're trading an open Uniswap-pool from the start. On a launch, you're trading against the curve itself until graduation, then switching to a pool afterward the tokens in your wallet stay identical through that switch, but the pricing mechanism underneath does not.

What Stays the Same Across Both Versions

A few things don't change between Pons launchpad version 1 and Pons launchpad update model. Trading fees still split between the creator and the Pons protocol, with the current 70/30 split applying to the active factory and the original 90/10 split still honored for tokens launched under the legacy factory. Creators on either version can also opt into buying back their own token, with anything repurchased locked and vested over five years rather than dumped back on the market at once.

Locked liquidity also behaves the same way on both: once it's locked, there's no unlock function and no privileged wallet, including pons itself, that can pull it back out.

Final Word

Pons Launchpad models explained side by side comes down to one core shift: version 1 prices a token through an open pool from block one, while Version 2 prices it through a bonding curve first and only creates a pool at graduation. Everything else the pairing flexibility, the snipe-protection method, and the destination pool-version flows from that single design choice. Longer-term plans for how both versions evolve are covered separately in pons' 2026 roadmap, worth checking if you're tracking where the protocol goes from here.

Disclaimer

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. All information is sourced directly from pons' official documentation at docs.ponsfamily.com and may change as the protocol updates. Tokens launched through any launchpad can be highly volatile, illiquid, or lose all value. Always do your own research before transacting.

Dishika Ahuja

About the Author Dishika Ahuja

English News Writer coingabbar.com

Dishika Ahuja is a skilled crypto writer with a year of experience in blockchain and digital assets. She excels at breaking down complex concepts, making the world of cryptocurrency accessible to all. From Bitcoin and altcoins to NFTs and DeFi, Dishika presents the latest trends in a straightforward and easy-to-understand manner. She keeps a close eye on market updates, price shifts, and emerging innovations to deliver insightful content. Her writing supports both newcomers and seasoned investors in navigating the fast-changing crypto landscape. Dishika is a firm believer in blockchain technology and its potential to transform global finance.

Crypto Press Release

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Faq Got any doubts? Get In Touch With Us