Picture a normal money market fund. It's where investors park cash they don't plan to use soon, and the fund puts that cash into very safe, short-term debt, mostly from governments.
Now change one thing: instead of a private ledger at a transfer agent, the list of who owns which shares is kept as tokens on a blockchain. That's a tokenized money market fund.
The difference shows up in the plumbing. With the old setup, trades usually settle in about a day, and only when banks are open. A token can move between approved wallets any time of day, as long as the fund's rules allow it.
Smart contracts handle the paperwork: they create a token when someone buys and cancel it when someone cashes out.
Now some of the biggest asset managers run live versions.
The yield comes from whatever the fund owns. That's mainly Treasury bills and other government securities, plus repos, which are very short loans backed by collateral, and some plain cash. Interest from all of that flows to holders after fees.
How it lands in a wallet depends on the fund. Some tokens "rebase," which means the number of tokens in the wallet slowly grows. Others keep the balance fixed and let the price creep up. Either way, the source is the same boring pile of short-term government debt.
Crypto has a cash problem. Many stablecoins pay holders no yield, while a Treasury-backed token can. Then there's the push toward real-world assets (RWAs), which let blockchain users hold things tied to the traditional economy.
Institutions like earning on idle cash without leaving blockchain rails. Tokens add on-chain liquidity and can work as collateral, so the same dollar can do two jobs. By 2026 the category had grown into the billions, though trackers don't agree on exact totals.
Transparency is the first draw, because ownership records sit on a shared ledger. Faster settlement is another: transfers can finish in minutes.
Programmability matters too, since smart contracts can automate payments. Tokens can also move 24/7, at night or on weekends, within the fund's limits. Some platforms also accept them as collateral.
BlackRock's BUIDL launched in March 2024 and sits among the largest tokenized Treasury funds. It holds cash, US Treasuries, and repos. Securitize acts as a transfer agent, and the $5 million minimum means only qualified purchasers can buy in.
Franklin Templeton's BENJI is the onchain share class of its US-registered government money market fund, FOBXX.
It's widely described as the first US-registered fund to use a public blockchain for its official share register. Access is wider, and select retail investors can join through its app.
| Feature | BUIDL | BENJI (FOBXX) |
| Issuer | BlackRock | Franklin Templeton |
| Access | Qualified purchasers, $5 million minimum | Wider, including select retail |
| Structure | Tokenized fund with Securitize as transfer agent | US-registered government money market fund |
In short, BUIDL targets big institutions. BENJI is easier to get into but smaller.
On ownership, traditional shares sit in a transfer agent's records, while tokenized shares live on a blockchain. Settlement shows the biggest gap: bank systems take about a day, while on-chain trades can settle far faster.
Traditional funds go through brokers and platforms. Tokenized funds use approved crypto wallets, and many still screen investors first.
Liquidity isn't so different. Both follow the fund's redemption terms, so faster rails don't promise instant exits. On one side, technology runs on older databases, and on the other, it adds blockchain records and smart contracts.
Collateral comes first. Some platforms accept these tokens to back trades. Crypto firms also use them for treasury management, parking idle cash in something that pays yield.
They can help with settlement between parties, too. Some stablecoin issuers hold part of their backing in short-term government instruments, and DAOs can hold cash-like assets for on-chain cash management without leaving blockchain tools.
Smart-contract and operational problems come first: a bug, a wallet mistake, or a failed transfer can cost money or time. Then there's a liquidity mismatch.
Tokens may trade around the clock, but redemption windows can be limited, so the market can feel more liquid than it is. Regulation limits access too: many products accept only qualified investors.
Counterparty risk is real too, since custodians, transfer agents, and repo partners all have to do their jobs. Yields follow interest rates, and a money market fund carries no guarantee.
It is likely that big asset managers continue to issue new tokens, signifying their rising interest in institutional investments.
If the momentum in RWA is sustained, and blockchain is able to prove itself as a valid method of settling transactions, cash management will become more efficient and flexible.
Further improvements in collateral utilization and tighter integration with payments could result. The remaining piece would rest on regulations, investor protection, and established demand.
For institutions and eligible investors who want cash-like yield with on-chain access, a tokenized money market fund is worth studying. It isn't a bank account, though, and it carries real risk.
Before investing, readers should check eligibility, fees, the fund's holdings, redemption terms, and the legal setup of the token. Official fund documents answer most of that.
A bank deposit or traditional money fund may still be simpler.
Disclaimer
This article is for information only and is not financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Crypto is high risk, and capital may be lost. Readers should verify facts with official sources and consult a qualified adviser before acting.