Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has joined a debate that matters to millions of Indian investors and builders: the India crypto tax rules.
Speaking around Devcon 8 in Mumbai, he said the 30% levy on gains and the 1% TDS (tax deducted at source) could weigh most on small developers.
Here is what he said, what the rules actually say on the government’s own page, and what could change.
Devcon 8, the Ethereum community’s annual developer gathering, ran from 3 to 6 November 2026 at the Jio World Centre in Mumbai, as the Ethereum Foundation’s announcement and the Devcon website confirm.
According to reports of his remarks, Buterin made three main points:
The burden: The 30% rate on gains and the 1% TDS on transfers could disproportionately burden smaller developers and discourage innovation.
The opportunity: The country can become a global leader in blockchain, thanks to its active developer community and open-source projects.
The idea: With friendlier rules and less red tape, the technology could support services such as UPI, the national instant-payments system, and government platforms.
The Income Tax Department’s official page explains the rules for virtual digital assets (VDAs), the legal term covering crypto assets, NFTs, and similar tokens.
This is the core of the India crypto tax system:
Rule | What it means |
Flat 30% rate | Income from transferring a VDA is taxed at 30%, plus surcharge and cess |
Limited deductions | Only the cost of acquisition is allowed, and other expenses are not |
No loss set-off | A loss on one VDA cannot be used to reduce the levy on another gain |
1% TDS | Withheld on payment to a resident for a VDA transfer |
TDS limits | No TDS up to ₹50,000 (individuals and HUFs below set business limits) or ₹10,000 (all other payers) |
Reporting | Specified reporting entities must report crypto-asset transactions |
Because only the cost of acquisition counts, costs such as servers, tools and time cannot be subtracted.
Because losses cannot offset gains, results across different tokens are never netted against each other.
A simple example, before surcharge and cess, shows the effect:
Trade | Result |
Token A sold at a ₹10,000 gain | Taxable gain: ₹10,000 |
Token B sold at a ₹10,000 loss | Loss ignored |
Real overall profit | ₹0 |
Levy at 30% | ₹3,000 |
So someone who broke even overall still owes ₹3,000, and 1% TDS can be withheld on each sale along the way.
This is why critics say the rules can hit small participants hardest, and it is the kind of friction Buterin’s comments point to.
Buterin’s comments are opinion, not policy. Rates are set by law, so any change would need the government and Parliament to act.
The department’s page still lists the 30% rate and 1% TDS at the time of writing.
For readers following the India crypto tax debate, the signals to watch are official notices from the department and statements from the Finance Ministry.
Keep clear records of the purchase cost and sale value of every transfer
Check how much TDS was withheld on each sale
Read the department’s page for current rules, and ask a chartered accountant about your own case
Treat commentary, including Buterin’s, as opinion rather than a change in law
Conclusion
In short, the India crypto tax debate is about whether a 30% levy with no loss offsets suits small builders.
Buterin argues it does not, but the rules stay in force until the government changes them. Watch for official notices, and keep your records ready.
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and is not financial or investment advice. Crypto assets are high risk, their prices can be very volatile, and you can lose some or all of your money. Always do your own research and consider speaking with a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.