Zilliqa ZIL Delisting: How to Withdraw Tokens Through ZILEVM

Vaishnavi Rayka
Vaishnavi Rayka
Published:
Share:
Zilliqa ZIL Delisting: ZILEVM Withdrawal Steps and Checks

How Zilliqa ZIL Delisting Affects ZILEVM Withdrawal Access

The Zilliqa ZIL delisting on Upbit has pushed many holders to check where their tokens sit. Trading support ends on November 16, 2026, and withdrawals stay open only until December 16, 2026.

The timing matters because Zilliqa has also retired its older network. ZIL now runs on Zilliqa EVM, often shortened to ZILEVM.

What follows covers the delisting itself, the move to ZILEVM, the withdrawal routes the project lists, and the risks that remain. Every route runs through ZILEVM, which is why the Zilliqa ZIL delisting and the network change are tied together.

What Are Zilliqa and ZILEVM?

Zilliqa has run its own layer-1 blockchain for nine years, using sharding, which splits network work into smaller groups. Its native token, ZIL, pays for transactions and smart contract activity.

ZILEVM is the Ethereum-compatible side of the network, also called Zilliqa 2. It supports the wallet formats and contract tools that other EVM chains use.

The project says Zilliqa EVM is now the only production network. The older non-EVM side, called legacy Zilliqa, is being retired. Its site also says Zilliqa is becoming an Ethereum Layer 2 for regulated institutions, with ZIL staying as the single token.

What Does the Zilliqa ZIL Delisting Mean for ZIL Holders?

A delisting means an exchange stops offering trading for a token. Delisting does not wipe out the token itself, and the blockchain behind it carries on running as before. 

Most exchanges leave a grace period open for withdrawals, so holders get some time to move their funds. Once that window closes, deposit and withdrawal support usually stops as well. 

For the Zilliqa ZIL delisting, Upbit's notice covers the ZIL/KRW and ZIL/BTC pairs. Trading stops on November 16 at 15:00 KST, and users must complete withdrawals before December 16.

How Did the Ledger Incident Lead to the Zilliqa ZIL Delisting?

In July, Zilliqa disclosed a signing flaw in its Ledger hardware wallet app. The project's Ledger incident page says the bug touched only legacy, non-EVM transactions. Zilliqa EVM was not affected.

The post-mortem reports at least 6,772 exposed accounts. It also puts proven theft at about 683 million ZIL.

Upbit placed ZIL on a trading caution list on July 22 and later found the grounds unresolved. Zilliqa then disabled legacy transactions, chose to retire the legacy side, and opened migration to every legacy holder.

How Did Exchange Balances Move to ZILEVM?

Zilliqa shifted exchange balances through a series of hard forks. A hard fork is a network upgrade that older software cannot follow.

Each fork moved ZIL held by participating exchanges from legacy addresses to verified Zilliqa EVM addresses. 

Those exchange moves began well before the Zilliqa ZIL delisting date. Exchanges then restored deposits and withdrawals at their own pace, as covered in earlier exchange migration news.

A later Zilliqa hard fork update added Pectra support, an Ethereum compatibility upgrade, and needed no action from self-custody holders.

Which Withdrawal Routes Exist After the Zilliqa ZIL Delisting?

Zilliqa's own post for holders on Upbit and Bithumb lists two routes. Both rely on the Zilliqa EVM network.

The first route is a withdrawal to a self-custody EVM wallet. The wallet must have the Zilliqa EVM network added first.

The second route is a transfer to another exchange that supports Zilliqa EVM, which keeps the Zilliqa ZIL delisting from locking tokens in one place. That exchange must also have ZIL deposits enabled.

The post stresses selecting the correct network before sending. A wrong choice can send tokens somewhere the receiver cannot access.

How Is Zilliqa EVM Added to a Wallet?

The official network details list the values below.

Field

Value

Network name

Zilliqa EVM

Chain ID

32769

RPC endpoint

https://api.zilliqa.com

Currency symbol

ZIL

The usual flow after that is short:

  • Add the network to the wallet with the values above.

  • Copy the wallet's EVM receiving address, which starts with 0x.

  • Select ZIL and the Zilliqa EVM network in the exchange withdrawal form.

  • Paste the address, and consider a small test transfer first.

How Can Legacy Wallet Holders Migrate?

Holders who kept ZIL in a legacy wallet follow a separate path. The Zilliqa ZIL delisting does not cover those wallets, yet the legacy retirement still applies to them. Zilliqa released a migration app built on zero-knowledge proofs, a method for proving ownership without revealing secrets.

Installation steps for Linux, Windows, and macOS appear on the official migration blog. An address checker also shows the status of a wallet.

Zilliqa advises relying on its incident page, not unsolicited messages or recovery links. Seed phrases should never be typed into unknown pages or shared in chats.

What Do the Market Numbers Show?

Market data on November 12, 2026 gives a sense of scale. The backdrop to the Zilliqa ZIL delisting is a small, low-priced token. ZIL ranks about 468th by market cap.

Metric

Value

Price

About $0.0015

Market cap

About $31.5 million

Fully diluted valuation (FDV)

About $32.1 million

Circulating supply

About 20.64 billion ZIL

Maximum supply

21 billion ZIL

Market cap multiplies price by circulating supply. FDV multiplies price by maximum supply. The two sit close here because roughly 98% of ZIL is already circulating.

The same data shows a fresh low near $0.0015 on that day. A low price does not signal network failure by itself, yet thinner trading after a delisting can add pressure.

What Risks Remain After the Zilliqa ZIL Delisting?

The Zilliqa ZIL delisting brings a few practical risks on top of the usual price swings that crypto holders already face.

  • Missed deadline: Tokens still sitting on Upbit after December 16 may become hard to reach, and from that point the exchange’s own terms decide what happens to them.

  • Wrong network: ZIL sent to a network or address that does not support Zilliqa EVM can be lost permanently, since such transfers usually cannot be reversed or recovered.

  • Thin liquidity: Once a large exchange removes its trading pairs, fewer venues are left, which often means wider spreads between buy and sell prices and sharper moves on smaller orders.

  • Recovery timing: Recovery for holders with exposed legacy keys runs through a separate framework, and its timing was still undated in the project's August update.

  • Network changes: Zilliqa's site says its developer docs, explorer, and blog will be deprecated soon, so network details may change as the Layer 2 plan advances.

  • Phishing: Fake migration pages and recovery links often appear after security incidents, so unknown links carry real risk.

Is the Zilliqa ZIL Delisting a Verdict on the Network?

The Zilliqa ZIL delisting reflects an exchange's decision, not a ruling on the blockchain. Upbit's move followed its caution designation after the Ledger incident and a review that left the grounds unresolved.

Zilliqa answered with a structural fix instead of a patch. The project says a patch cannot restore a key that has already signed, so it retired the legacy signing scheme.

The available data suggests the real test is liquidity. Zilliqa EVM needs wider exchange support, and the stated institutional plans, including the Ethereum Layer 2 move, still need visible usage to prove themselves.

Conclusion

The Zilliqa ZIL delisting changes where the token can be traded, but the token itself and its blockchain stay fully active.

Zilliqa has retired its legacy side, and ZILEVM is now the network that withdrawals land on.

Holders on Upbit face a December 16 withdrawal deadline under the Zilliqa ZIL delisting. Open questions remain around liquidity, recovery timing for exposed accounts, and crypto exchange support for the new network.

The next details to confirm after the Zilliqa ZIL delisting are the receiving platform's network support and any final notice from the exchange. Fresh crypto exchange delisting news can also change timelines.

Disclaimer: 

This content is for information only and is not financial advice. Crypto assets are volatile and carry a high risk of loss. Details can change, so independent research is needed before any decision.

Vaishnavi Rayka

About the Author Vaishnavi Rayka

English Blog Writer coingabbar.com

I am Vaishnavi Rayka, a Crypto and Web3 Content Writer with professional experience in researching and writing about blockchain technology, cryptocurrencies, decentralized finance (DeFi), tokenomics, and emerging Web3 projects.

I specialize in transforming complex technical concepts and industry developments into clear, engaging, accurate, and reader-friendly content. My skills include SEO content writing, in-depth topic research, content optimization, and developing informative articles tailored to specific audiences and content objectives.

With a strong interest in the rapidly evolving Web3 ecosystem, I am committed to producing well-researched, high-quality content that delivers value to readers while aligning with SEO best practices and industry trends.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Faq Got any doubts? Get In Touch With Us